I hope you realize that less than half of all rapes are ever even reported, and out of the 46% that are reported, only 9% lead to a persecution and only 5% lead to a conviction. That little 1% statistic people like you throw out all the time is most likely much, much higher than we realize.
By “people like me” do you mean the person who supports the freedom, liberty, and constitutional rights of the human in the womb? That’s what you meant, right?
Below are the latest available (2009) statistics on why women choose to have an abortion. These are from AGI & CDC.
The rape argument is a straw man. It is used to try and make the exception the rule. In the cases of less than 1%, I would suggest intensive counseling and adoption options. This could easily be done.
Notice that the overwhelming reason is: I just don’t want it, it doesn’t fit my lifestyle.
On average, women give at least 3 reasons for choosing abortion:
3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities; about 3/4 say they cannot afford a child; and 1/2 say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner (AGI).
Only 12% of women included a physical problem with their health among reasons for having an abortion (NAF).
One per cent (of aborting women) reported that they were the survivors of rape (NAF).
Despite a federal appeals court ruling that government snooping on emails requires a search warrant, the FBI and other federal law enforcers regularly ignore this constitutional mandate, according to documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union under the Freedom of Information Act. At the same time that it acts as if it has the authority to violate the privacy of citizens’ emails, the FBI is seeking Congressional authorization for its unlawful activities.
It has been illegal for law enforcement to open sealed envelopes and packages in the U.S. mail since 1877, when the Supreme Court case of Ex Parte Jackson held that a warrant is required by the Fourth Amendment. It has also been illegal to snoop on ongoing electronic communications like phone calls without a warrant since the 1967 case of Katz v. U.S. Although emails have raised new issues that have yet to be entirely resolved, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (which hears cases from Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee) ruled in Warshak v. U.S (2010) that opening emails requires a warrant based on probable cause.
According to the documents obtained by the ACLU, however, federal law enforcement, including the FBI, IRS and others, believes the warrant requirement does not apply to emails, and U.S. Attorneys’ offices around the country have issued inconsistent and even conflicting standards to the issue. The resulting confusion creates plenty of room for mischief.
The FBI’s 2012 Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), for example, states that agents need a warrant only for emails that are unopened and less than 180 days old, with no mention of the fact that this is directly contrary to the ruling in Warshak. Although Warshak applies only in the four states of the Sixth Circuit, the DIOG advice could place investigations at risk if other courts go along with Warshak, and it certainly directs agents in those four states to defy the law.
Although documents received from the Justice Department Criminal Division and six U.S. Attorneys’ offices (in California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, and New York) were heavily redacted and sometimes even unidentified, they reveal similar problems. Two paragraphs in an unidentified document from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, for example, state that law enforcement can obtain “opened electronic communications or extremely old unopened email” without a warrant—but redactions make it impossible to tell if this is current policy or not.
On the other hand, an October 2012 document from the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois states a warrant is required to obtain emails, citing the Warshak case. But like the document from New York, heavy redactions make identifying the document or its purpose impossible.
Although the six U.S. Attorneys’ offices told the ACLU that, since Warshak, they have not authorized an email search request without a warrant, a recent Texas case undermines that assertion. In that case, which mainly focused on the judge’s denial of the FBI’s request for a warrant to surreptitiously infect a computer with spyware, the feds also obtained an order—without a warrant—under 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (Stored Communications Act) forcing an Internet service provider to turn over the contents of an email account that had been used to commit fraud.
So if you think your emails are being read by law enforcement—you might be right.
The nation’s largest movie theater chain has cut the hours of thousands of employees, saying in a company memo that ObamaCare requirements are to blame.
Regal Entertainment Group, which operates more than 500 theaters in 38 states, last month rolled back shifts for non-salaried workers to 30 hours per week, putting them under the threshold at which employers are required to provide health insurance. The Nashville-based company said in a letter to managers that the move was a direct result of ObamaCare.
“In addition, some managers have requested guidance on what they should tell those employees negatively impacted and, at your discretion, we suggest the following,” read the memo obtained by FoxNews.com. “To comply with the Affordable Care Act, Regal had to increase our health care budget to cover those newly deemed eligible based on the law’s definition of a full-time employee.”
Nice job, Obama voters! Your so-called “free healthcare” costs more people jobs and work hours by the day. Great work!!
Lucy, was in tears after a TSA agent subjected the three-year-old girl to a full patdown; she has spinal bifida and is in a wheelchair. Throughout the patdown, the little girl was weeping and saying: ‘I don’t want to go to Disney World.’ The family was flying to Orlando from their home in Missouri.
Today was the official qualifying for the front row of the Daytona 500 and the lineups for the Budweiser Duels to be run on Thursday. Here’s the complete rundown of the rules and how everything plays out for the Daytona 500.
To start, the Sunday before the Daytona 500 is when every car will make…
While the governor’s plan may not fly with state lawmakers — including Senate Majority Leader Randy Richardville, who has openly stated his opposition to the gasoline tax — it sets the stage for several months of discussion and debate.